Literature can make you think of flowers and blossoms even on your worst of days. Stay tuned to be mesmerised with the beauty of reading…
To choose to write is to reject silence
— Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie.

To choose to write is to reject silence
— Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie.

For a cchange I have chosen to write through what is deemed as free writing. Here I am just mumbling about a phenomenon I have been contemplating about for couple weeks now. In fact, this very notion has been stuck in my head, not knowing how to best articulate it…
My emptiness and desire to spew bile, some rancous disturbing thoughts that need to be spitted out has triggered the need to pen this down. At this present moment, writing about my thoughts and not a book review is a bit discomforting and comforting at the same time because the meeting point is carelessness that is driven by the gravitas of the two points of departure.
In not so many words, my intention is to invite the readers to what I deem as obscurity. Something mundane yet necessarily to share, not for purposes of instilling fear (whatever that fear may look like) or to create a particular fascade about one’s writing. More than anything the point is simply to display the obscurity of writing, and writing as a form of obscurity. If you question my charge, my answer is in front of that very thought of yours – there is no formula. In other words, this is an obsolete charge, there are no grey areas. It’s all obscure, mundane and unorthodox period.
Following the rules is boring, especially when writing carefreely. Every author deserves to write their “fvck you” kinda book, text or lmpiece something like Americanah. Something so carefree.
Without mumbling and bumbling here, I want to cut to the chase. This piece was prompted by a short clip I encountered earlier today from Toni Morrison wherein she describes the loneliness of writing. The loneliness that potentially drives one to create their own world through creative writing. Creating the familiar and the disfamiliar, the usual and the unsual, myth and fact. What was more striking in her charge as I continued listening to that clip, she kept emphasising how her first novel, The bluest eye (sadly my copy disappeared at work, and I loath the day I misplaced the only copy I had of that novel), alas what MS Morrison said about that iconic novel about Picola is that pockets of what transpired in the novel was to some degree biographical. She mentioned the geography, location, time and place so to speak. This meana that what was biographical in thag novel wqs the setting of the novel. It was her assertion about loneliness that sparked the desire for me to pen down this piece.
Essentially, my meditation is about the obscurity of love. Basically it is mostly difficult to explain what it means to love, to be in love and being loved. And quite often our definitions of these varient categories is imperfect, at certain junctures, quite obscure and far from the truth.
Quite frankly, even truth itself exists not when it comes to the question of love. It is only when one is in time of solitude and solace that the ideation of admiration becomes more prominent. In times of solitary, in times of aloness. That is truely synonymous to the art of writing. A very lonely journey. It’s just you, your pen, your thoughts and the ‘subconscious’, the imaginary reader. You do not know how he or she will receive your work but for some weird reason you only hope that they will receive the work in good faith.
They will appreciate both your intricate fallacies and silent modulation of your voice, tone and style of writing. Last but not least what heightens this obscurity even further is the harsh reality that not everyone will receive your artistic work in the same way but the beauty lies in not caring. The carelessness thereof should not be mistaken with arrogance but viewed as assertiveness. The only exception to this front is when receiving an informed, brutal confrontation from your peers who are as “not so brilliant as you are” . Otherwise, keep insisting in the obscurity. The mess, confusion and complexity. The less linear you are, the more proportionally you are close to prowess.
Here one has to channel some serious dexterity of those who have walked the path before. The less spoken about: the poets who wrote for Staffrider, the writers who wrote when no one was bold enough to do so.
What is more fascinating in general about instances of war, combat and unprecedented times of tyranny and turmoil is that as a common thread, is disappearance. Not only is disappearance reducible to the ideation of people migrating from one City to the other, one town to another, or in the worst case scenario “honyelela” (as is in death). Previously, I have already touched about this notion of disappearance when I reviewed Ngozi’s Half of the yellow sun. It’s one thing that is most striking about that novel, especially toward the end of the novel. Better yet when one watches the movie, that very phenomenon becomes more palatable then when reading about it. As to why maybe when one engages that film as a text, one can be able to reach the consensus to, at the very least, comes to terms with the point driven home here.
In this next inscription the focus is not the idea of disappearance as it occurred in Ngozi’s work. Far from that. Here, the idea of disappearance is largely focused in the painstaking reality of many black woman households whom have to bare the brunt of brutally. As we usher into the 16days of activity, #NotInMyName #SayNOToGBV – the disappearance here relates to migration.
The Coal Train, iStimela (the song by Minkie tells it all). Quite frankly, this appears to have been a tragedy that Mama Barbara had witness in her upbringing. Not only a witness but at times a victim as pointed out in her offering, Poli poli. We are often told that the danger or rather the risk of memoir writing is that it can lead one to retraumatise oneself or those close to them, and it is without question that perhaps this could have been the case, but we can never know because paradoxically the opposite of that is the feeling of insurgent repulsion to no longer withhold feelings of trauma, to use the pen as form of a catharsis, to unleash all the emotions into an intellectually woven text in order to spark a long-lasting conversation. By no means does Mme Barbara paint her family, both maternalistic and parternalistic family into any “angelic or saint-like imagery” she tells it all.
As I follow a very unintelligible way to read this book, I present three pressing issues about memoir writing and not so much the mechanics of the family life reflected here. I say this because previously I have written about Ntate Hughie. Here I want to emphasise into family dynamics. The first being that of locality – upbringing and context. As one would imagine, it can never really be an easy thing for any child to be raised in a tavern. All sorts of dangers come with the territory, it is just the nature of the business. However, given that the Bower family found itself caught up in estranged relations with the government of the time, a form of resistance was to sell bjala as a form of resistance, but to also make ends meet, sell bjala to the mineworkers, many of whom as we are told in the book came from different regions of the Southern hinterland (surely by now, the song Istimela resonates with you as it does with me while penning this piece).
The disappearance that is most striking is that of her grandparents, because of racial mixing. Secondly, the disappearance of the children. Each following their passion or rather their wishes. Thirdly, the disappearance of family ties. Family ties in the form of unity. Most families go through these kinds of disentanglements, in one shape or form. The book Poli Poli explores this dilemma in the most intricate manner, reason being, these are issues that Mme Barbara had to relive as she kept writing her book.
It is particularly the chapter Alexandra that brings everything into context. Precisely because this was at the time that she and her siblings were in their teen years. They had to leave their grandmother and move into their parents’ household in Alexandra, Gomora. Obviously, this was a change of scenery because they Middleburg, Mpumalanga to leave in the City of Dust, of Mine Dumps (eMgababa, ‘Egoli Kwandonga asipheyeli’). Literally, that chapter paints the gruesome brutality of apartheid South Africa in how it tormented black families. Obviously today we live in different times. But one can just imagine what it took for people of mixed race to face the harsh realities of mingling with darkies. Not too black not too white – a difficult situation. In this same chapter, the book explains expansively where the phenomenon of coloured stems from. And there is no one consensus about this identity. There are always differing views based on a number of issues including the nature of upbringing.
In this case, the Masekelas grew up as the middle-class children, only because of their parents’ involvement with umzabalazo became very much integrated into the world of the Mandelas, the Sisulus etc. The continuous social work activitivism that her mother was involved in, her own form of cultural activism is what kept the sanity of the nuclear family into strong ties. Sadly though, there were no guarantees. Distant relatives as it is explained in the book had different agenda, and it is telling in how some of the cousins collided to bring about pain into the family by means of killing their own. It is for this reason that the ideation of disappearance is most fascinating in the book, because it aptly speaks to the idea struggle. Many exiles, often painstakingly touch on this issue – be it in the form of losing loved ones or losing their own lives to alcoholism and other forms of isms.
Logically, one can read this book as a way for Mama Barbara to unearth the history of her own family, to tell those of us who know more about her brother, and not really the other siblings, that appear to be constantly in the backdrop of Hughie’s success story. In fact, their parents were educated, and this is one point quite emphasised sharply in the book, not as a form to boast but more so as a means to indicate that she has lived a life of resilience. Having been in movement and the congress, she led with a fist. Similar to how the song, Wathinta abafazi, wathintha iimbokodo.In the congress movement, it is a tradition to indeed lead with a spearhead. The congress movement over centuries and time in memorium, has always been at the forefront of the mass democratic revolution.
The most intriguing aspect of this particular memoir, as a form of remembrance, memoir stems from the ideation of writing about one’s self story, a notion based in writing for generations to come to understand the story. Barbara tells a story about her son, Selema who she also named after her own father. Selema was raised as we are told in the book by his uncle (infamously also referred to as Minkie). That is a name only his sibling called, no one else used that name except for his beloved sister. The tragic situation as she describe it was her parents’ divorce, it led to serious turmoil within the household. As her mother would often complain about her father’s visit to his peers and ‘associates’.
But that is besides the point, the matter that is indeed a point of departure, in as far as the contour of critical thought is the description she mentions about the so-called South African War. Historians often debase the notion that the Brits were mostly supported by indigenous nationalities. In fact, she correctly explains that “Even a cursory look at the events that occurred in the Eastern Transvaal from the arrival of the Voortkekers until the conquest of the Ndebele and Pedi kingdom reveals veritable messages assemblage of nationalities (not ethnicities, as that is often tends to create a misguided notion of tribalism) were involved in the mixed bag of incursions, raids, ambushes, battles and hunts that took place between the settlers and the indigenous groups”
This is a book that is truly recommendable. Read it and enjoy.
Read more. (a republication).
Once again, we visit a story that reflects on the Drum Generation era, an era that gave us fearless journalist. In Small things, Nthikeng decides to write his novel and base it through Todd Matshikiza’s life tory. That is why in the previously blog (please read it). I mention my obsession with this particular era, and I have previously written an email to one of the forefront researchers and academic about this particular epoch. This was at the time wherein I had intensions to conduct research work at the University of KwaZulu Natal, but due to reasons that I will not divulge the project did not materialise.
But the important lesson I learnt from that experience was that there is so much more to learn from that era. “Golden Post” is the new buzz word. Do more research perhaps it will make sense to you too, if you are also interested in the subject matter.
The novel Small things by Nthikeng Mohlele in its attempt to narrate a story of a former journalist who in hindsight reflects on his time in prison having been incarcerated by the Security Police. In the unfolding story, setting is used to describe the developments of the characters including that of Che as we come to know him. Throughout the unfolding story in the novel we are unable to locate the actual name of the main character. This is to say, Che is a name used to partly to refer to the person we may assume to be the main character. but that is not his real name either.
Also, the novel plays with setting in quite starkingly intriguing ways given that different parts of Johannesburg as part of his experiences noting for instance the he describe Soweto, Hope Street in Meadowlands where he came from to be a place he now resents given that a foreigner from Mozambique had occupied his home.
In another passage, the main character, Che or rather Dark Figure – the novel creatively plays into this mystification of the main character as a way to create mystery, describing Vilakazi Street, Soweto as a modest metropolia, a place where a myriad of personas met to ‘break bread’. These are individuals from different parts of the world, of different cultural and class milieux. Now, the interesting matter to note at this point, is that, in Nausea – which is the second part of the book, post the main Character’s release, we learn of his new journey of him trying to re-establish his life and trying by all means not to be caught in any wrongdoing of his past.
Another writer who has written a thought-provoking piece about this novel, Timothy Wright (2019) describes this novel as some form of a post-revolutionary anomie partly because Che as the protagonist has “live[d] through both struggle and its aftermath, and in so doing have developed fraught, melancholic relationships with the allegory of emancipationist redemption”. In saying so, what Wright means is that Che lived during both eras with the main character trying to re-establish his life under new South Africa, a life of freedom. Even with that, Che does not necessarily find his life to be pleasing provided that he was haunted of his past experiences working as a journalist. Even post his release, he lives a life of a homeless educated man, hopping from one place to another. There is a passage wherein Che says “I sleep in city squares, bath in public toilets. The pigeons know me by name now – but they are too busy competing for breadcrumbs to converse about life and its limits”. This is obvious post his life living in much better conditions when he lived in Sophiatown, a place he was able to mingle with people of mixed races. However, because of the illegitimate regulations known as the Group’s Area Act, Che is moved to Meadowlands, in Soweto a township pregnant with all sorts of socials ills including crime. At this point, Che is longing for his desire for his former lover, Desiree who has now moved on as she got married to a Nigeria Mathematician (so we are told). Despite that he still insists on persuading her with his “poetry”, his love for words. He nonetheless persuades Desiree, but after a while an unfortunate incident happens, he gets attacked by The Dark Figure, he wanted some “benjamins” from him. Basically, he was mugging him. After a while, Che spends a few days in a hospital having sustained bullet wound injuries. Even when the police visit him to investigate the shooting, Che profusely refuse to provide the officers with the answers they were looking for, and part of his explanation for not to cooperating with the police is that inmates (or rather prisoners), both those inside and outside, know of one another. Hence his rationale was not to give out the information in fear of being attacked by the same perpetrator that shot him.
So, Che’s life post his incarceration is imbibed by lots of drama and misery of love story, with him trying to find love with Desiree, but Desiree has another part. Che ends up taking a new life, doing a job he did not like doing but he did anyway as a means to an end.
As a result, Che describes his new life having to travel between Soweto and Johannesburg CBD, as a life of mystery always on the lookout. At some point he describes his stay at hospital as to a situation wherein he could have died a beautiful death, a death “with rhythm”, signifying the surrounding circumstances and the context, where the shooting in Nelson Mandela Bridge, and the irony here, now that he was living under the so-called “freedom”, his life was away from such because he was still subjected to tyranny of violence, the violence of the City life.
Things change for the better for Che, when he gets employed for piece jobs by The Big Chief, the Minister of Tourism, also an ex-prisoner, a fellow poet hires Che as a way “to advance the revolution”. It is at this point in time wherein Che begins to take his horn lessons seriously, his attempt of being a prospect jazz artist, a trumpeter. Fortunately for him, he gets introduced to another beautiful lady by the name of Mercedes, he falls madly in love with. And unlike, Desiree, his admiration for Mercedes is more intense and for obvious reasons, their admiration for one another is punctuated by the ‘art-istry’ – the commonality of jazz music, paintings and poetry. He impresses her largely with his poems, and fortunately she receives them in good favour as well. “You kiss with military precision, my poet. Your embrace is as delicate as the hands of a bomb’s technician.”
As the story continues, Che continues to live a life of an artists, with no guarantee of the next pay or something to eat, so his moving around from one place to another remains his reality despite him having moved in with another comrade, Benito – a fellow jazz artist. At this point, Che’s contract has ended in terms of working with The Minister of Tourism, so he languishes seeking for assistance from others. Sadly, Gabriel, Mercedes’ father did not approve of their affair precisely because he was convinced that Che was a loser. Towards, the end of the story which happens somewhere in Durban, Che learns of the passing of Desiree, and the way Amazu deals with the grief is astonishingly different from way Che does. Che was absolutely indifferent, as he goes to argue that he is not one to grief immediately, for him it takes a while to come to terms with such a finality. As for Amazu, he was completely in distraught. At this juncture, the idea of setting, with Che living in the suburbs, Hotels, one 144 Verona Heights, a life is ironically of a different nature, material conditions partly changed yet is still exposed to life’s un-timing chaos and misery. A life of a hopeless poet. Often than not, poets endure meaninglessness precisely because it feeds their impetus. It creates starvation of their creative genius. We learn best about this phenomenon by greats like Papa Ramps. Rre Rampolokeng. Perhaps, a review of his work will be something to consider in the near future.
Hence, towards the end of the novel – Echoes, the poetry comes through in terms of the prose, and the intent is to bring forth the metaphorical and symbolism to bare, and so when one reads the subtext, it appears as if Che contemplated of committing suicide, and he says he was killed by small things, bees. This is after all the chaos and hardship he had been through, particularly that of losing Desiree and the disapproval of Mercedes’ father, it seemed to Che that life was no longer worth leaving, hence at the end of the novel we are not even told his real name, it remains as Che, although the name of The Dark figure gets revealed.


More information about Todd Matshikiza: (available: https://toddmatshikiza.com/)
Wright, T. (2019). Ruined time and post-revolutionary allegory in Nthikeng Mohlele’s Small Things. Social Dynamics, 45(2), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533952.2019.161927
Unearthing the meaning of ‘wording’ in African novel writing.

In African customs and heritage, names are not meaningless. They do not exist just for the mere sake of naming nor do they emanate from nowhere. Names carry sentiment, value and knowledge. In fact, names portray a particular message for reasons only known by those who give the name(s) themselves.
Here we go down in unearthing one of the most enthralling novels, a novel that was written by one of the most complex women writers of her time, Mme Bessie Head. Bessie Head was born during the apartheid era, went to become one of the few women to work for the Drum magazine. Among her colleagues in the newsroom were Can Themba, Nat Nakasa and Lewis Nkosi to mention a few. This is a story written with a very complicated narration, a story whose characters bring to bear the harsh realities of black life, a life of misery and anguish. If anything, through this novel, readers begin to ask themselves at what point does one really get to establish their own identity. I say this with moderation of course because for me it was not an easy journey having to decide which character I related to the most, and which character I favoured the most.
Either way, someone else would also question is it important to even have a favourite character in any novel? My answer is of course in the negative. It is not a must. But that is besides the point.
My journey with this novel is more about breaking my quell to read and complete reading Bessie’s work. You would ask yourself why is that the case? My response might completely surprise you.
If like me, you are interested in the Drum generation of South African writers, a group of writers that I personally deem as ‘the most free-spirited of South African writers’ who wrote at the peak of apartheid South Africa, whom were not scared to speak against power. You would definitely not complete a conversation about the Drum generation of writers without the mention of Bessie Head. Her personal story is a fascinating as the novels she has written. Having written three novels, Maru, When Clouds Gather and The Question – all three are easily regarded as seminal feminist texts.
Now, let’s get into the business of the day. Let’s indulge in the poetics of analysis. I title this review as Maru a pula – the clouds of the rain because of my appreciation of african customs. Not only that but also because the novel itself engages with the metaphor of rain being a medium of nourishment, a source of life and cleansing. That is precisely my reading of the novel. This is obviously at the level of the obscure, at a philosophical level. I hope my not so expansive analysis will explain why this title.
As I move into my analysis, I gravitate toward Maru: the polemic of a ‘apartheid erasure’, and this is the reason why:
Try to question yourself: what really is apartheid erasure, what form, shape or colour it is, it has none of the above. If anything Bessie Head in composing this novel, delves into the capacity of writing a story based on her personal life. Having been “born as crime” under the apartheid rule, at a time when the marriage between black folk was white folk was completely an unacceptable. A crime at worst. In her novel therefore she structures her story around the ‘newsroom’.
The newsroom basically is the staff room. If you have read this novel you will understand what is meant by that, if not touché. Generally the novel is composed of fascinating characters of mixed personalities with quite amusing persona, all of whom make the novel extremely nauseating if you understand what being taken for fool means.
A character by the name of Maru appears to be the king of the castle, he treats his subordinates like a nobody but as the story unfolds he gets dethroned. All along he thought he is the only smart guy in his circle, only for him to collapse. That is the tragedy of this novel.
To make things simplistic, let us undergo the linear unprogressive way of text analysis since it is the most basic thing to do. Academic literary review apparently to some people is meaningless simply because they assume to know more. Otherwise, those of us who put in the hours to script, narrate and keep the literary space intact, we continue to deconstruct texts as we see it fit.
Maru, a man of Steel, he behaves exactly like his totem, he does not let any “Tom, Dick and Harry” to do as they please in his presence. In fact he gives zero fucks. He doesn’t care at all. Maru had his comrades, and his second in command was Moleka whose sister is fondly in love with Maru. It is for this reason that Maru and Moleka were so tight as compatriots, sharing a serious camaraderie – one that semblances that of Che Guevara and Fidel Castro, really true compatriots.
On the other side of “the road” is a different cabal under the hospice of Ranko. This is a man of no values wanting to dethrone Maru from his prestigious marriage with Dikeledi, a woman who made the entire villagemen to wisp their “windscreens”, so if you wish to read the novel with a pleasing appetite, I suggest that you pay attention to the extreme plot twists that transpire in this canonical text.
The story takes place in some fiction village located in Bots called Dilepe, Margaret Cadmore is a women from a foreign country so it turns out that within the unfolding story, she arrives in Botswana as an outcast. Since she is not of the lineage of the Batswana, she proudly maintains her identity of being ‘a woman of colour’, only to be unjustly regarded as a “Masarwa” (a derogatory label that was used at the time to refer to woman of colour). She nonetheless, lives her live unapologetically sane as a woman of colour despite being treated with disgusting approach by the people of Dilepe village.
Over a couple of time that she spends in that foreign land she eventually manages to immense herself into the livelihood of this foreign land that she finds herself in. Over a some time, some people opt to associate with her, especially Ranko, Semana and others.
Now, in the novel, because it is set in Apartheid South Africa, and Maru, set in Botswana where Bessie Head wrote it; at the time this novel was among the many banned novels since Pik Botha’s lowlife men and women were obsessed with surveillance of black people’s lives. Assuming that they were less of, an absolute rubbish kind of “apartheid mentality”, as it were. Today, indeed we are not under the doom of Botha’s government. However when reading this novel and situating it at the time it was written, the sheer aggressive and painstaking narration of this text says it all. That Margaret Cadmore and George Cadmore were obsessed in creating conflict among black people noting that due to some “ethnic diaconfiguration”, a tact would be to always falsify each of these people’s perceptions of one to the other, realising that they would squabble within their very own grouping.
Moleka and Maru were complete hero’s among their cluster, this is because they were “think-alikes”, a poetic saying in English states: “great minds think alike”, so they would in every circumstance withhold each other’s views, constantly so, despite any unforeseeable differences or disagreements. They always stuck to each other’s positionality.
So as the novel unfolds, we meet Ranko who is the enemy of Maru since he wanted to take his woman from him and he kept not withholding instructions he received from other gentlemen from the village, going out of his way to undermine Maru’s decisive instructions and command.
What then happens is a mystery, Maru makes his efforts known in the village by means of finding a teaching job for his wife, and ensuring that she does not get disturbed there not even by Ms Cadmore.
Maru did not take light the idea of being undermined by what some would term as “village boy” (as it is told in the novel, herdboy basically). The plot twist though is that Margaret Cadmore, always held a particular view about black people just the same way that black people had very indifferent and unwelcoming attitude toward one another, things of sheer stupidity – tribalistic ideas are quite of no value given that they give birth to nothingness. Just vile thoughts of lust decorated in a form of either envy or pretense love one whose structure is baseless. It is a phenomenon in my view that has no base at all. It has no foundation whatsoever, one that reconciles or rather reflects a humongous construction building being held tightly together by a solid foundation, “tshimologo”. The beginning of a beginning whose end is ultimately rested on the bases of its structuring. In other words, a long lasting binding companionship.
Based in the village of Dilepe, the story goes on that eventually Maru gets married with Dikeledi and he sends his ‘forces’ to kill Ranko. Bessie Head was ahead of her time in writing this novel simply because it captured the violence among men, on a daily stats on the man-to-men killings are very strenuous.
At the end of the day, in her writing, Bessie Head always questioned the structure of violence not at the peripheral level or at the surface level. She was never about the tip of the iceberg. In her writing, she always questioned the structure and the superstructure. Hence, when you read her other writings including The Question of Power and When Clouds Gather, you begin to understand her writing to not only be superficial not even close to that.
Her writing is that of critiquing the inequalities of the era she lived. It is no wonder then that many African feminists, writers and poets that are her successors in the literary discipline continue to be inspired by her approach in writing with a slithering, critical and cut throating approach.
In terms of her other novels including When Clouds Gather and Question to power, one cannot escape the reality that those particular texts where of her own biographical journey and somewhat telling in that she bequelled the idea of living, surviving and writing in a foreign land, considering that Bots was not being her place of birth. She only lived there because she was in exile. That was where she went in hiding since the government of the time was anti-her journalism career similar to how most journalist that worked with her went into hiding, some sadly died in exile. However, given that Bots was an independent state during her writing, it cannot be ignored then that her writing career reached astute heights simply because she could write freely without any form of intimidation, threats and surveillance.
Writing at a time of speculations, threats and sickening surveillance must have been really a frustrating persuasion altogether simply because the writer is unable to traverse his or her tapestry due to “fear of intrusion”. Fear of intrusion in this sense refers to one’s writing being intercepted and decoded – but since Bessie came from a serious school of thought as far as journalistic and scholarly persuasion, she was ever fearless, bold and unapologetic, a goddamn critique.
The role of writer is to ordinarily and in-ordinarily speak against the powers that be. Question the superstructure, expose it and condemn it whenever the need arise without any fear whatsoever.
A fearful writer is not writer at all. What is there to fear when death itself is the means to an end, and an end is the ultimate price for a writer that write what needs to be told.
Now, going back to the metaphorical lens, it can be said that in dealing with the effects of racism, tribalism and sexism, the novel manages poignantly to demonstrate the unintellectual basis of these biases. There is no form of thought and reasoning that justifies these vile meausures (i.e. racism, bigotry, sexism and violence). At a metaphorical level it can therefore be said that in the novel, Head manages to insanely delineate the manner in which some of her characters being a representation of a bigger idea – what would often be regarded as macrocosm. Maru has two elements into his persona – the rain and the clouds. As for Moleka, he symbolises the thunderstorm because of his demeanor and ways of doing things, and yet the two are close of friends. The only issue is that they are in love with the same woman, Margaret, but at some point Maru finally wins her over, whilst Moleka goes on to marry Dikeledi.
But, the interesting thing in how Bessie Head tries to critique racism, she reveals that no matter from where racism emanates itself from, by its very nature, it is an unforgivable damn animal. As such, Margaret’s role in the novel becomes an interest feature in that she all by herself constantly endure racial prejudice from the Batswana since many of the people both at the school and the people of Dilepe kept giving her crazy attitude.
As such, through Margaret having married Maru, she slowly gets integrated into the village life of the Batswana and all of a sudden becomes the impetus for change in two interesting yet decisive ways.
First, by symbolically reuniting Moleka with his heart; second, by withholding herself from him so that he could unite with the efficient, unprejudiced, and power-mognering Dikeledi. This is to say that it appears as if Margaret was not forceful at all as far as her methods were concerned. Weirdly too, she was even unaware of them therefore making her being the symbolism and catalyst for change even more intriguing. In other words, Margaret was unconscious of her role and this in my view speaks to the inevitability of the effected change that she managed to gradually effect in Dilepe through her quiet moves. By her efforts, “the wind of freedom” (126) enters the space of the Masarwa tribe, the “dark airless room in which their souls had been shut for a long time” (126).
Elsewhere, Alan Ramón Ward argues that told that before going any further, “Maru’s representation as cloud must be considered as it relates to the possibility that Maru and Moleka represent two parts of the same character before Margaret’s appearance: Maru representing the heart, Moleka representing the self without the heart”.
What Ward is alluding to here speaks to the possibility of associating Maru with clouds (mara a pula, my emphasis) becomes a reading of him being like the clouds that need force to produce rain. Whilst Moleka symbolically representing a force that needs substance, the cloud, their relationship is emphasises by these polarised differences. Making it more magically when reading their friendship – two friends being in love with the same woman, quite tragic at the same time.
Hence, once cannot run away from the deep rooted meaning of the Setswana idiom being at play in this novel in that Maru is “indeed that banking of clouds” that is unable to “release its beneficial downpour.”5
Hence, we cannot downplay the use of indigenous knowledge systems in this novel as it seriously and carefully plays with the ideation of idiom and metaphor. Maru a pula. The cloud and rain in most african knowledge systems have a great meaning.

Credit: Peter Kevin Solness/Fairfax Media/Getty Images
Read more of her novels: When clouds gather (1968); Maru (1971) and The Question of Power (1973)
Craig Higgingson an internationally acclaimed writer and literary scholar opens a short story entitled, That Famous Winter Brown Day, and this marvelously written short story is part of an anthology of short stories titled: Hair: Weaving & unpacking stories of identity woven. It is a collection that in one’s view really tap into the tapestry of literary works since they are able to encapsulate the deep emotions that allow one to relate to what the characters are going through.
In his short story, Higginson writes about the following characters, there is a sick mother whose name is not provided and the narration takes place in first person, also when we read the ongoing story it is as if the author is writing about what is almost true. The opening line is quite deeply catching and it draws the readers mind immediately to what is about to happen in the unfolding story that follows. “His mother died on his birthday. He was in the story room at the television studio when his wife called”. That is how this story opens, as a reader you cannot help but ponder, and question yourself what else is going to transpire in this story. The story basically without giving too much detail takes us through a journey of a young man who has not seen his sister in ages, she went to work in the United Kingdom (UK), and the grandmother had two cats, she loved them dearly so the son came to take care of his mother, only for him to arrive with her already body already perished.
This young man whose name we are not told whom he is arrives at at scathing, disgusting and very mellow situation wherein his mother is laying in the bathroom all alone with no one to take of her, only the two cats she loved dearly, Orange and Blue.
He gets to hear the saddening news that his mother is late from his beloved wife “Your mother has collapsed” when you read That Famous Winter Brown, the story does not necessarily state these words are coming straight from the wife’s mouth since the author deliberately chose to scribe the narration in first person, so as a reader you may assume that it is him who is saying these words whereas they are said by his wife, but the actually conversation is not recorded in the prose.
So as the story goes on, and this young fellow upon hearing the sad news rushed going by driving with an enormous speed, one in which was not the usual “He drove home more deliberately biding his time. He arrived to find his mother on the bathroom floor on her garden cottage. She had been living with them for nine months. She was lying under an old blue blanket with her feet sticking out one end and her hair out the other”. it is for this reason that in the same anthology, Craig Higginson uses the artwork of a famous photographer called Sue Greef and we are told that “from art historical references, iconography from borrowed from popular culture…” Sue Greef’s work (this is the photograph that Craig Higginson used to align his short story with the same short story he wrote, and the nice thing is that the two really align in as the depiction of the imagery used, one call really align the two and note the relatedness of two.
Needless to say, in the That Famous Brown Winter, the wife and the sister were seemingly not seeing eye, we are not sure whether it’s because the wife of the main character whose name is not mentioned was honestly allergic to the cats or rather, she was just not entirely sure about his brother’s wive, however, what remains to be true is that the young fellow loved his mother. Also, the sister assured her sister-in-law that “it was the saliva on the hair people were allergic to, not the hair itself”.
Through this lens one may in one way or other bring forth the argumentation that indeed the way some folks live with their families, as this short story shows us they may not entirely in unison but in the main, as the young fellow was the leader in the household, he was able to show skills of leadership, and did not pay too much attention on what was entirely happening in this household, all he was worried about was to ensure that he showed his mother appreciation at all given times.
In closing, as a way to juxtapose the poem written in this short story, with another poem by Pablo Neruda, Neruda writes “Alturas de Macchu Picchu” (translated into English The Heights of Macchu Picchu
Irresistible death invited me many times:
it was like salt occulted in the waves
and what its invisible fragrance suggested
was fragments of wrecks and heights
or vast structures of wind and snowdrift
Similarly, in the The Famous Brown Winter the writer speaks about the great appreciate he had toward his mother, now these two poems do not speak about death, however the juxtaposition lies in how Pablo Neruda’s poem speaks about death, his own deaths that he suffered from given that he was also a revolutionary in his own, the character from this short story we are told write about:
“From her body, she gave me a body to live in she same her a sister, who is also my friend”
These two poems as you read the two stories, you will note that there is similarity, another literary scholar, speaks about familiarisation – meaning familiarising oneself with literary works is all about. It requires one to continously read texts beyond just reading the written word, to also focus on the unspoken, what the text says and what it does not say. In this instance, Craig Higgisons fails to take us through the deeply enrooted emotions of his main characters. What would of great importance in his following edition of this beautiful yet shallow short story is to actually narrate what transpires through dialogue, yes he is a playwright and he has written extensively and directed shows globally, but what would be of great importance would be for him to actually take us through what really transpires in the story similar to how he managed to convert his play, The dream of the dog into a novel he could channel his energies into translating this into a whole book.
References:
Neruda, P. (2012). Selected poems. [Translated by Nathaniel Tarn]. London: Vintage Books.
This is one of my most recent books reads, and I felt compelled to at least respond to the book by reviewing it. Not only because I enjoyed reading it, but also because it’s a book that address a very hot potato if you will, the Zuma Case that Adv. Bulelani Ngcuka chose not to prosecute. This particular topic is such a “hot potato” in that even the author herself, Marion Spark chose to open the book with it – sadly it’s a matter that continues to haunt Adv. Bulelani Ngcuka till this day, we learn this in the book, and very much so since the Zuma case has not yet been solved.
With that said, this is a book that I would definitely recommend this to anyone and everyone, particularly those who are working or intending to be involved (in one shape or form) in the legal fraternity. This is a book about a brilliant advocate, par exccellence Adv. Bulelani Ngcuka, who in my view, has stood the test of time similarly to his successor Adv. Vusi Pikoli whose book, My Second Initiation that he co-authored with Mandy Wiener, also addresses the politics of public prosecution in the country.
Now, there might be some of you who might be wondering as to whom I referring to here? Well, the answer is simple go read the book (chuckles). In all seriousness though, this is a book about a man with integrity, great stature and incredible political fortitude. Advocate Bulelani Ngcuka – the first National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) who pioneered the establishment of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) and its Directorate of Special Operations (DSO also known as the Scorpions). The story of how these structures were formed is quite fascinating but I will come back to this point.
What is important to mention is that The sting in the tale, is a book that was authored by Adv. Ngucka’s comrade, Marion Sparg – a former journalist and activist (a member of the ANC and its military wing, Umkhonto weSizwe). In the book, she quickly addresses a pertinent aspect of proximity to her subject matter, in other words her relationship to Adv. Ngcuka and issues around objectivity as far as writing a book about her own comrade. Now, in order to capture this intriguing aspect of the book, I want to draw to your attention the way Marion addresses this matter in the book in her own words, and this is what she had to say when she described her relation to Ngcuka: “He and I share the same political home, the African National Congress. I first met and worked with him in parliament, and then at the National Prosecuting Authority, where I held the position of Chief Executive of the National Prosecuting Authority and the Scorpions for seven years, from 2007. I write this account therefore not as an impartial observer but I’ve hopefully avoided what some view as hagiography” (Sparg, 2022, p. xv).
Hagiography, basically refers to the art and science of recording history (biography in this case) that treats its subjects as saints. In other words, only narrating the story of person in question in the positive light, and not bringing about any form of nuance and/or dissent. Needless to say, Marion Sparg goes on to say “Still this is not a detached account”. It is this very admission that I personally find to be what seems to disqualify the disclaimer of the author about the book given that throughout the book she does not provide much of her own thinking and analysis about Adv Ngcuka’s actions in terms of how he handled various challenges he faced in his life, nor does she provide her perceptions about some of those decisions that Adv. Ngcuka made as the NDPP. So in a way, she appears to be leaning towards supporting whatever disposition that Adv. Bulelani takes in reflecting about the challenges he dealt with in his life. This is to say, her objectivity is very much limited, if it does exist.
But at the same time, as a reader you also gain a sense of what the author did intelligently was to let the other people who are spoken of or about in the book, and or those who worked with Adv Bulelani Ngcuka to give their own opinions about his conduct. Thus, distancing herself from any obligation to form any opinions about her colleague. Whether or not objectivity was maintained carefully here is a topic open for a discussion, and my humble opinion is that perhaps the author could have found other ways to be more creative in tackling this specific matter of objectivity.
Going back to the book, the book is written by Marion Sparg as mentioned earlier, and Adv. Bulelani Ngcuka’s voice features in the book throughout the narrative of the book. The difference is that Bulelani’s voice is indented and the author uses a different font to signal this. Hence, while reading the book, the book does feel like an interview, without necessarily being one of course and this is despite the obvious that Marion had to obviously interview the advocate, however my point is about the narrative, it flows like an interview in terms of its form. Moreover, this is a book that gives an account from Adv Ngcuka’s point of view. This is succinctly evident in what Prof. Nyameko Barney Pityana says: “[i]n this book Bulelani’s authentic voice can be heard loud and clear”. And so the book, is a first-hand account of South Africa’s recent legal and political history, with Adv. Bulelani Ngcuka being one of the key role players in ushering the democratic dispensation having played a fundamental role in formulating the constitution of the republic, being a former speaker of the National Council of Provinces as well as his most well-known role that he played as the first NDPP”.

The book consists of Five parts in detailing the upbringing and the humbling beginnings of Adv Ngcuka – leading all the way up to the time he eventually left the NPA. This is to say, Part One deals with the Zuma case, in this part we read of the politics that unfolded, how the case arrived at the office of the NDPP and why the decision not to prosecute JZ was made etc. Then, Part 2 deals with “The beginning”, in my view this is the part of Adv. Bulelani Ngcuka’s life that many of us do not know about, partly because, I suspect, the former NDPP has always been discreet. And so in this part we learn about his humbling upbringing, his coming out of age and his roots essentially. In this part, I was really taken aback by Mama Kholosa’s decision (Bulelani Thandabantu Ngcuka’s mother) to take a ‘class suicide’. Mama Kholosa’s reason(s) to make the decision to give away her teaching career is/are not made known explicitly, but it is inferred that she chose to leave her teaching job since her husband, Mr. Douglas Ngcuka (Bulelani’s father) “worked as a Senior Superintendent for the department of public works in Qonce (King William’s town)” and “only came home on weekends” whilst she and the kids, Bulelani and his four siblings (Vuyani, Phelelani, Phumla and Feziwe). As such, Mama Kholosa “gave up her career to look after the family” this was her way to subsidise her husband’s earnings to keep the family afloat.
Part two continues to touch on Bulelani’s formative years, all the way until he was a teenager, his first encounter with politics and his political conscientisation having been inspired by one of his cousins, Boniswa, who was a Pan Africanist and a member of the Pan Africanist Congress of Azania. And this is what Bulelani had to say about that influence “Politics was the daily bread at home. The area we lived in, Centane was a PAC stronghold at the time. We learned a lot from discussions; we learned about what was happening on the rest of the continent…”. This is another reminder that sometimes in politics, the inspiration into political activism
Part three on the other hand, deals with the mechanisation of the new political dispensation, so in this section of the book we get to learn about Bulelani’s workings within the ANC both in terms his political involvement in the New Democratic dispensation. This is at the time when he got involved in the UDF, going to exile, working on for the constitutional committee within the ANC structures, and eventually working alongside another struggle stalwart Adv. Dullah Omar, at the time “Dulllah Omar had been appointed [as the] Director of the Centre” (the at the UWC’s Community Law Centre which is named after him today, see: https://dullahomarinstitute.org.za/about-us/about-the-institute) and Adv. Ngcuka became the deputy director. In this committee, the likes of Zola Skhweyiya, Albie Sachs, Kadar Asmal and Brigitte Mabandla were also part of it include the law academics from UWC that were of the delegate as well. These colleagues had to deliberate on issues such as constitutional democracy as well as parliamentary soverignity”, ideating about the formation of the constitutional court and the like. Interestingly here, Adv Ngcuka reflected on the way parliamentary sovereignty vs constitutional democracy was such a contentions issues, because understandably it is quite strange that once the National party relinquished political power, it become so adamant in having to protect minority rights such that they opposed parliamentary sovereignty and leaned more towards constitutional democracy, and the irony here is that when they were in power the former was the rule of law – parliament made laws and not court of law could oppose the laws that were enacted in parliament at the time. But as soon as a democratic government came into power, the Nationalists were the first to problematise the need for a majority party to lead a government using parliamentary sovereignty as the rule of law, but I guess this is a topic for another day.
Part Four and Five deal with issues that the NPA had to deal with at the time, during Ngcuka’s tenure as the NDPP. Without revealing more than I already have about the book, I do want to make the statement that personally, there is no other political period of this country that fascinates me the most than this period when President Mbeki was the President of the Republic, when the NPA and The Scorpions were functioning properly. The period that Adv Ngcuka was at the helm of the NPA, helping the nation to curbing criminal activities that were rife at the time, both white collar crimes and blue collar crimes. This includes the bombings at the behest of PAGAD in Cape Town, mass political killings in KZN (which have recently resurfaced in the country by the way) and the high numbers of car hijacks in Gauteng. Sadly, the crime rate in our country continues to rise to alarming heights.
This then leads me to what stood out for me in the book. There are several issues that stood out for me in this book, not only in terms of Adv. Bulelani’s stellar job that he executed as the NDPP in terms of actually forming the NPA itself and its sub-entities, but also because of his role in shaping and influencing the policies around prosecution in this country. The performance of the NPA has been proven of the years that it was at its best functioning era during Adv Bulelani’s tenure – this is the only man to have worked in the office of the NDPP for the longest of time. Perhaps Adv. Shamila Batohi might surpass those number of years, but that is besides the point. The point is that the NPA was functioning like a well oiled machine during Adv. Ngucka’s time, and perhaps its prominence could have dwindled after Adv. Pikoli was sacked. And as history would know, the NDPPs that came after Adv. Vusi Pikoli were much of a disappointment.
Needless to say, the first story that stood out for was the one about Madiba helping Jacob Zuma financially back in year 2000. This follows after Madiba had relied the news to Adv. Bulelani Ngcuka that he had chosen to also assist the then President of the PAC, in 1996, Clearance Makwetu whom at the had “lost his position as the president [of the PAC] (p. 19)”, Makwetu allegedly asked for financial assistance from President Mandela since he had lost the case with cost after failing to win a case he had lodged against parliament for losing his job, and Madiba assisted Makwetu since he had “arranged for a few business people to help Makwetu” (p.19). Now, the intriguing part here is that President Mandela deemed it as the right thing to do to also assist comrade Jacob Zuma financially since Zuma was in debt at the time. In the book we are told the following “After telling me this story, the President turned to me. Zuma is my brother. If I can do these things for Mkawetu, nothing would have stopped me from helping Zuma. All he had to do was ask”. This is the story that Bulelani relays as something he was told by Madiba, the plot twist however unfolds as follows: Madiba went to say “Why would he ask Schabir Shaik for assistance and not me?”. All of this information came to the fore when the scorpions were busy investigating the Zuma’s relationship with Schabir Schaik and their link/involvement into the arms deal, a story that was broke out by Patricia De Lille.
Later in the book, Penuell Maduna and Bulelani Ngcuka were summoned by President Mandela and met him in his car during the “ANC’s 51st national conference” that took place in 2002 in Stellenbosch. In narrating the story, Bulelani paints the following picture “When you visited Madiba and discussed certain things, we would write them down on a piece of paper and show it to you… then he would take sit and burn it and destroy it, there and then in his office” (I suppose this is the side of Madiba that many do know about, interesting right?). Ngcuka goes on to say “On this occasion he said we must sit in his car. We sat and spoke for two hours. He wanted all the details about the case so I told him everything. There was a talk that he had given Zuma R2million to help him with his debt. I told him about this and he said I should leave it with him”. So the story unravels that indeed Madiba helped Zuma financially and to his disappointment Madiba got to learn that the money was later channelled to Zuma’s co-accuse, Schabir Schaik. We are told that Madiba later confirmed by saying “I gave Zuma money, and I am surprised that the money I have him now reflects as having gone to Schabir Shaik”
This is one bombshell that I did not expect at all from this book. It’s stood out for me because it gets to show that this issue of corruption is not new in this country, and one here is stating the obvious because Adv. Pikoli (whom I spoke about earlier also spoke boldly about the emerging concerning acts of corruption prior to 1994 that existed in the camps of the ANC. In his book, Adv. Pikoli laments that some MK members and ANC comrades were broke in exile, but when they came back into the country, the become wealth all of a sudden.
The other two things that stood out for me in the book, I mean I could go on about this book, but I do not want to further spoil it for you as a potential reader of the book, is the love story between Adv. Bulelani Ngcuka and his wife Mama Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, the former Deputy President of South Africa. The most enthralling part of their love story is the fact that they got married whilst Bulelani Ngcuka was in prison. This speaks to the brutality of apartheid, the apartheid regime really loathed black people such that it restricted, to some degree, the way black people could love one another, let alone mixed-raced couples. As a case in point, Adv. Bulelani Ngcuka’s was denied the opportunity to marry the love of his life in the year he had intended to marry her, so he had to postpone the marriage, but in their resistance, the couple devised a plan to actually get enagaged whilst Bulelani was still imprisoned. His imprisonment did not deter the love they had for one another. The delegation from Bulelani’s side of the family including the likes of Pius Langa, Steve Tshwete, Victoria Mxenge (quite unorthodox for a woman not related to the broom’s family to be sent as part of the lobelia negotiation delagation) and Bulelani’s brother, Vuyani. Another fascinating aspect of this beautiful love story is that Bulelani’s brother, Vuyani represented Buleni during the engagement ceremony, “placing the ring on Phumzile’s finger” (p. 84).
“[t]he engagement sent an important message to the apartheid regime: that the couple would not allow themselves to be frustrated – that they were going to win in the end”.
According to Marion, “[t]he engagement sent an important message to the apartheid regime: that the couple would not allow themselves to be frustrated – that they were going to win in the end”. This particularly aspect of their love story is really inspiring, it speaks to what many of my age mates today are longing for, an unwavering love for one’s partner, the resilient kind of love. Till today, Bulelani and his wife, Mama Phumzile Mlambo Ngcuka are still married*. If this does not make you aspire to long life marriage and companionship, I do not know what will. This is the same kind of commitment Walter Sizulu had for Mme Albertina Sizulu, Oliver Tambo had to Mme Adelaide Tambo, and the unrelenting love that Mangaliso Robert Rabogoe (Sobukwe) had for Mme Zondeni Veronica Sobukwe.

The one painful part in this book, and I doubt if I will manage to do justice in capturing the pain that both Griffith Mxenge and Victoria Mxenge were brutally murdered by the apartheid regime. That is the one part that will rapture your heart in the book. I think it’s best I leave it to you are the reader to make your own sense about the circumstance that led to their untimely deaths.
Like the tale of stinging scorpion some part of the book have a long-lasting excruciating pain that leaves you as reader bereft with unanswered questions about so many things.
*More on the love story between Adv Ngcuka and Mama Phumzile Ngcuka read this article from the iOL: https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&sca_esv=600132350&rls=en&sxsrf=ACQVn08r5cdFatPCNATGLC9VDHlQu27Plg:1705792212400&q=bulelani+ngcuka+and+phumzile+ngcuka+in+honeymoon&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj6woWXi-2DAxXEV0EAHawRA_wQ0pQJegQIDRAB&biw=1264&bih=710&dpr=1#imgrc=fMwuXIRBCZneSM.
They faced and continue to face
the whip of squirming consequences
caused by the consistent silencing
and policing of their voices,
their bodies and their entire
existence continue to be neglected.
They face erasure in all its forms
and manifold manifestations
disguised as
tradition, culture, and heritage.
Their being
is reduced to the zone of non-being,
their needs and aspirations are displaced
and ignored as if their lives matters not.
Women, black women in particular
face erasure in all spheres of life,
be it in the history books, in the arts,
in the economy, in geopolitics and everything-in-between.
Women, black women in particular
are the main victims of this quagmire.
It will only take women
to dismantle this monster
by writing, singing, painting and sculpturing
their names into existence
like Zenzile Makeba did.
Lucid Lies
Ingane ishelwa ngamanga
To win the love of a beautiful queen,
You have to tell her
lucid lies.
Build her a castle that she
cannot refuse to live in with your words,
choose them carefully and be deliberate in how you say them.
Sometimes it is not what you have that matters to your queen,
but how you do and say certain things,
I use the word “certain things” carefully here
because I am not here to prescribe, but to suggest.
Lucid lies are best understood
when energies are aligned.
If you are her yin and her
your yang, then these
lucid lies will all make sense.
It might not make sense now, but
Remember that:
ingane ishelwa ngamanga
to win the love of a beautiful queen,
you have to tell her
lucid lies.
These are my poems that I have written which grapple with the idea of love, a force that I believe to be the most revolutionary of all. The world would certainly be meaningless if it had not been for the existence of love, even beautiful things like flowers, the stars, rivers and oceans would absolutely have no sentimental value whatsoever; had it not been for the existence of love. Love makes us appreciate beauty in inexplicable ways and that is the beauty of love.
So without further ado here are two poems:
I long for
I long for
a sense of belonging,
for being affirmed, nurtured and reassured.
I long for our rants,
mischievous acts of lunacy, frank talks,
and pillow talks.
I long for the crazy times
we spent with each other,
the long crazy hours we would spend over the phone
talking about nothing and everything.
I long for the irrationality that characterised our
passion and compassion for each other.
You made me complete,
sane and insane
all at the same time.
I long for the moments I missed
to be there for you,
to show up for you
and reveal my true love for you…

Artwork by @levy_pooe titled: Motho le motho wa gagwe, 2021
Acrylic on canvas.
Porgy
My dear Porgy,
Magic is what is written in your eyes,
the gaze is luring, my thoughts are numbed by your precious eyes.
You are the book that is magical in my world.
I so wish I was the character
in this book that rescues you
from despair.
Sadly, the plot for this book
is betrayed by our long lasting friendship,
perhaps my sin was not being upfront with you,
that I have always wanted to be more than friends with you,
from the very first day we met.
Maybe this will be possible in the next lifetime,
but I remain hopeful.
Porgy, I love you dearly,
always remember that my dear porgy.
NB: These two poems will also be featured in my upcoming debut anthology of poems like the previous two from the last blog post.
Recently on twitter, my dear comrade and brother, Mpho Ndaba (via @manofcolor_) tweeted that poetry matters and I could not agree with him more. As result, I saw it fit to share a few of my poems that I have written over a couple of years ago. Some of these pieces I have shared before, some not – please do indulge in any case.

When poetry meets jazz
When poetry meets jazz,
jazz becomes poetry
with dense metaphors
whose grammar, syntax and style
shapes the world with its melodic timeless textures.
When jazz meets poetry
poems compose poignant musings
whose sound quell emotions
of bondage, and the brutality of racial violence
– lamenting about black subjectivity.
The improvisation forces the composer
to drown in the imaginative world,
to paint images with colours and illustrations
that take his audiences on a trance,
I’m speaking here
of transcendental musings
and meditations.
When jazz meets poetry
the poet becomes the composer
composing songs of solitude,
solidarity and serenity.
When jazz meets poetry
poetry becomes jazz
and jazz becomes poetry.
when poetry meets jazz
jazz becomes poetry
and poetry becomes jazz
Grazing
Still grazing
in the plantation that the master has built
with the hope to dismember the black folk.
The situation is scathingly unbearable,
but the black folk
found ways to subvert the oppression
by making compelling music
to numb the pain.
The trumpet blows loud in the misty
winds of a cloudy Mississippi morning
in the fields.
The whip carries no power anymore,
the song keeps reverberating the uncompromising
sense of hope and resilience
That is inherently
BLACK.
Still grazing
in the plantation that the master has built,
only the songs of Solomon carry
the resilient hope of the
slaves in the fields of Mississippi.
I close off by reminding you folks that poetry matters, and the purpose of poetry is to: “…express an imaginative-emotional-intellectual experience of the writer’s… in such a way that it creates a similar experience in the mind of his reader or listener” as Clive Sansom puts it succinctly.
Disclaimer: I do not own the rights of the songs featured. Also, these two poems will soon be featured in my upcoming debut anthology of poems.